17 May 2013
Was the Bingham Canyon landslide the largest historic non-volcanic landslip in North America?
Posted by Dave Petley
Various media agencies are reporting a story about the Bingham Canyon landslide of a few weeks ago, suggesting that this might be the largest landslide in North America in historic times. This has been prompted by some work by Jeff Moore of the University of Utah, who has compared the landslide with other events in North America. Jeff kindly emailed me about the analysis. First, to set the record straight, his analysis is that Bingham Canyon is the largest historic, non-volcanic landslide in North American history. This is an important qualifier as the 1980 Mount St Helens eruption started with a flank collapse that had a volume of about 2.9 to 3.7 billion cubic metres, and so was much larger
Jeff’s calculation for Bingham Canyon looks like this: the estimated mass is 165 million tons, which corresponds to about 55 million cubic metres of source volume and 65-70 million cubic metres of deposit (allowing for bulking of the mass during movement). In comparison, these are the largest recorded non-volcanic landslides in North America according to Jeff’s review:
- Mt. Stellar AK – Sept 14, 2005 – 50 million cubic metres of rock and ice total, but initial detachment = 10-20 million cubic metres of rock.
- Mt. Steele Yukon – July 24, 2007 – between 28 and 80 million cubic metres including a “significant volume of ice”, modeled as 50 million cubic metres deposit.
- Mt. Meager BC Canada – 48 million cubic metres – 6 August 2010 – turned into 12 km debris flow, no deaths, ~largest in Canada.
- Hope slide BC Canada – 47 million cubic metres, January 9, 1965, 4 people killed – two seismic events noted, previous largest in Canada.
- Frank slide NWT Canada – Apr 29, 1903 – 30 million cubic metres – 70-90 deaths – Turtle mountain area today.
- Madison River Canyon (Earthquake lake) Montana – Aug 17, 1959 – 28-33 million cubic metres – 28 deaths.
- Lituya Mountain AK – June 11, 2012 – 5-60 million cubic metres – no deaths, poor volume estimate from deposit on glacier.
- Lituya Bay AK – July 9, 1958 – 30 million cubic metres – 5 killed from tsunami.
I cannot really disagree with this list, but would point out a couple of things. The first is that of course there are larger ones in pre-historic times. Indeed the largest of them all in terms of ancient landslides is the deeply bizarre Heart Mountain landslide in Wyoming, which has a volume of about 3,400 billion cubic metres. But as this is over 40 million years old it does not count as being historic. I think the landslide at Seaward in Alaska triggered by the 1964 earthquake had a volume of about 210 million cubic metres, although the vast majority of this was underwater.
So I think he is probably right that this is the largest historic, non-volcanic, terrestrial landslide in North America in recorded history. That is quite remarkable given that it is man-made. Indeed I have been trying to work out whether this is the largest manmade landslide in history. The obvious candidate is the 1984 Ok Tedi landslide in Papua New Guinea (Griffiths et al. 2004), which was also triggered by mining. However, that appears to have had a volume of about 35 million cubic metres, so it smaller. Can anyone come up with anything larger?
It is a surprise to me that large, historic landslides in North America are so small! The Daguangboa landslide, triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, is over 1 billion cubic metres in volume, and this list includes many that are larger than Bingham Canyon. I wonder why this is the case?
Finally, I think it would be fun to start to compile a list of the largest landslides of the 21st Century. Any suggestions?
Saidmarreh landslide in Iran is the largest prehistoric landslide; Mount St. Helens the larggest historic landslide
Source: USGS Landslide Program FAQs
http://www.usgs.gov/faq/?q=categories/9752/2606
Just a slight correction: the Frank slide is not in NWT, Canada, it is near the town of Frank in southern Alberta (AB). Highway 3 goes right through slide, and there is an interpretive centre that gives you a good perspective on the whole thing.
Oops, I guess I spoke too soon. I guess in 1903 Frank was in the NWT, but the NWT has since shrunk! You can probably delete this comment.
One contender for manmade events is the ~80 million m3 rock avalanche at the Soviet Novaya Zemlia nuclear test site in September 1973. Triggered by an underground nuclear explosion, it blocked the valley and created a lake; the volume estimate is 60-80 million, leaning towards 80 million m3, and it was not the only one…
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-1-4020-4037-5_15.pdf
http://mercury.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/28878/ipublicationdocument_singledocument/81167c15-4726-4ea0-944b-5af44cc8fe5e/en/716.pdf
That is indeed interesting. I couldn’t find any North American landslides that are bigger than Bingham Canyon either. Only a few to add to the list of largest events: Mageik, Alaska in 1912 with 54 million cubic meters deposit volume (Griggs 1922 as cited in Shaller 1991); Kitimat, British Columbia in 1975 with 55 million cubic meters of sedimentary rocks (Shaller 1991); Gros Ventre, Wyoming in 1925 with 39 million cubic meters (Voight 1978); and Rubble Creek, Canada in 1855 or 1856 with 33 million cubic meters (Moore and Mathews 1978). Nothing man-made, though.
In the European Alps, for example, there is (to my knowledge) only the 1963 Vaiont rock avalanche with 250 million cubic meters (influenced by human activity, but entirely man-made?) that falls into North American historical times and is larger than the Bingham Canyon rock avalanche.
A list of the largest landslides of the 21st Century? Absolutely! How about a corner/link in your blog where people can put events they know into a list with landslide location, date, size and data source?
Landslide
I guess in 1903 Frank was in the NWT, but the NWT has since shrunk!