27 January 2010
On narrow-minded press coverage
Posted by Dave Petley
Southern Peru has for the last few days suffered extremely heavy rainfall. The Living in Peru blog reports upon the impact for local people in the province of Urubamba, Cusco. This includes
10 people killed; 2,000 collapsed houses leaving 10,000 people homeless; and crops, cattle and roads swept away. The district of Yucay is isolated due to the floods, the Vilcanota river has broken its banks on both sides, causing many local residents houses to collapse, and the police station has also been swept away.
So how does the international press report on the disaster? Like this from The Times:
Food and water dwindles as backpackers scramble to escape flood-hit Machu Picchu
British backpackers were among 1,500 tourists scrambling today to escape from Peru’s ancient Inca citadel of Machu Picchu, which has been cut off by floods and landslides since the weekend. As food supplies dwindled and hostels ran out of space, many were sleeping in the train station and the town’s main square, fighting for the few seats on rescue helicopters. “The situation is about to erupt,” Rudy Chalco, a tour guide with a group of elderly Europeans, told the Peruvian daily paper El Comercio. “We don’t have any more food, disorder is starting to reign, the soldiers and police that are here don’t know what to do or how to organise the help that has arrived, people are getting desperate and no one is taking charge.” Some tourists were prepared to pay up to $500 (£300) for a seat on one of the rescue helicopters, he said.
And so it goes on for a few more paragraphs. There is not a single mention of the plight of the local people, even though (as the article states) the authorities have declared a state of emergency.
This is the same in news reports in many other newspapers from around the world. Shameful!
Dave,Unfortunately, all that matters in the end is money. So when I contacted the press two years ago and gave them a landslide story..I was told that more people should die for the story to be taken up! The electronic media is no better and will not cover stories unless the story sells..so you will have the birthday party of a Bollywood actress being aired for 10 mins during prime time but landslides? Ahh! who the hell wants to air a story with JUST 10 people dead in some god forsaken place??
one of the Netherlands' most respected newpapers ended an article with the title 'hundreds of tourists still stuck in Machu Picchu', with the terrible conclusion that the tourists are beginning to get pretty annoyed by the situation, now that local vendors (a a result of scarcity) are raising their prices for food and drink.It was similar for the Haiti disasters, and any other for that matter. Our media were covering how many Dutch people might have died in the tragedy, as if they are 'more equal' than all those Haitian victims.
Dave -Here's one blog I found with a set of photo and video from the eventhttp://enperublog.com/2010/01/28/access-to-machu-picchu-completely-destroyed/focusing on the economic loss to Peru. You might find the video useful for your understanding of the event, whatever the failings of the editorial perspective.