5 November 2019

Satellite tracking shows how ships affect clouds and climate

Posted by larryohanlon

By Hayley Dunning

When ships burn fossil fuels, they release airborne particles containing various naturally occurring chemicals, including sulfur. These particles are known to modify certain types of clouds, which can affect climate. Better knowledge of how these particles, and particularly the sulfur components, affect clouds could help scientists create more accurate climate models.

In the latest study, satellite tracking was also used to show the impact of restrictions on sulfur in fuels, revealing the impact of ships on clouds largely disappears in restricted zones. This information can be used to build a relationship between cloud properties and the sulfur content of shipping fuels. Importantly, this could help shipping companies monitor compliance with sulfur regulations that come into force on 1 January 2020. The study, published today in Geophysical Research Letters, was led by researchers from Imperial College London, together with University College London (UCL) and the University of Oxford.

Emissions from ships contain several chemicals, including sulfate aerosols – small particles of sulfur and oxygen. The aerosols can act as ‘seeds’ around which water droplets accumulate, causing changes in cloud properties that are visible to satellites. This means that ships can change clouds, leaving lines – known as ship tracks – in the clouds behind them as they sail. However, exactly how these aerosols impact the properties of the clouds is not precisely known. This knowledge is important because the kinds of clouds that the emissions affect can influence climate warming, and is therefore important to capture in climate models.

Figure from the paper ‘The impact of ship emission controls recorded by cloud properties’ by Edward Gryspeerdt, Tristan Smith, Eoin O’Keeffe, Matthew Christensen and Fraser Goldsworth is published in Geophysical Research Letters

Aerosol are emitted from many sources, such as factories and cars, but it has been difficult to match these outputs with the influence on clouds, as there are many other factors at play. With ship tracks, however, the relationship is more straightforward, enabling researchers to tease out the links between aerosols and clouds more easily.

“Ship tracks act like an experiment that would be impossible for us to do otherwise – we cannot inject sulfate aerosols into the atmosphere at such scale to see what happens” said lead researcher Edward Gryspeerdt, from the Department of Physics at Imperial College London. “Instead, restrictions on the amount of ship sulfate emissions can contain provide us with a perfect experiment for determining just how important the aerosols are in cloud formation. By analyzing a huge dataset of ship tracks observed from satellites, we can see that they largely disappear when restrictions are introduced, demonstrating the strong impact of aerosols.”

The team studied more than 17,000 ship tracks from satellite observations and matched them to the movements of individual ships using their onboard GPS. The study period covered the introduction of emission control areas around the coast of North America, the North Sea, the Baltic Sea and the English Channel, which restricted sulfur in ship fuel to 0.5 percent, leading to fewer sulfate aerosol emissions.

The researchers found that in these areas, ship tracks nearly completely disappeared compared to before the restrictions, under similar weather conditions. This shows that sulfate aerosols have the most significant impact on cloud formation, as opposed to other components of the ship exhaust, such as black carbon.

Satellite images of the ship tracks near Cornwall, in southwest England. Credit: Edward Gryspeerdt, with data from NASA

The result also means that a ship not in compliance with the regulations, by burning the current high-sulfur fuels without exhaust treatment, could be detected because it would create a measurable difference in the satellite-observed cloud properties.

“Currently, it is hard for regulators to know what ships are doing in the middle of the ocean,” said co-author Tristan Smith from UCL Energy Institute. “The potential for undetected non-compliance with the 2020 sulfur regulations is a real risk for shipping companies because it can create commercial advantage to those companies who do not comply. This study shows that science and technology are producing significant advancements in the transparency of shipping, and helping to reduce risks and unfairness for responsible operators.”

As well as exploring how the method could be used to identify ships that may not be in compliance with the 0.5 percent limit, the team now want to more precisely relate known ship fuel compositions to ship tracks, allowing them to more accurately predict the influence of sulfur aerosols on cloud formation on a larger scale, ready to feed into climate models.

Hayley Dunning is Research Media Manager (Natural Sciences) at Imperial College London.