![\"moving](\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2014\/06\/14_06-Yanan-1.jpg\")
<\/a>Google Earth image of Yan’an in 2012<\/p><\/div>\n
..<\/p>\n
And this is the same site earlier this year:<\/p>\n
![\"moving](\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2014\/06\/14_06-Yanan-2.jpg\")
<\/a>Google Earth image of Yan’an in 2014<\/p><\/div>\n
..<\/p>\n
The enormous change is clearly evident.\u00a0 The scale of this programme is immense – in some cases 100 – 150 metres of mountain top is being removed, and the total land area involved is 250 square kilometres.<\/p>\n
Mountain top removal and landslides<\/h5>\n
The article raises a host of environmental concerns about this programme in China, including air and water pollution; soil erosion, subsidence, deforestation and ecosystem damage.\u00a0 All of these concerns are reasonable.\u00a0 Of course in the context of this blog, the interesting issue is the potential for landslides.\u00a0 And certainly there are reasons to be concerned.\u00a0 There are many reasons to think that such a programme might increase the risk of instability, including changes to groundwater flows and the cutting of slopes.\u00a0 However, in my view the greatest risks lie in the valley in-filling, which provides the potential for very rapid and highly destructive flowslides.\u00a0 In many other areas in which large amounts of fill has been emplaced, landslides have been common.\u00a0 Whilst techniques exist to mitigate these problems, they require great care and expertise.\u00a0 The extraordinary record of landslides associated with mining<\/a> and hydroelectric power <\/a>generation in China makes me wonder if the level of skill is sufficiently high to prevent accidents in such large projects.\u00a0 China is a very challenging environment for landslides, given the combination of steep slopes, weak materials, high levels of seasonal rainfall and intense seismicity.<\/p>\n The point of the Li et al.<\/em> (2014) paper is to call for more research.\u00a0 They state:<\/p>\n We call on the Chinese government to accelerate research efforts urgently. With good guidance, land creation could proceed with fewer risks and more benefits.<\/p>\n China’s best researchers from Beijing, Shanghai and Wuhan should join regional collaborations. And a national network, similar to the National Basic Research Programs of China, should be established to coordinate this effort, to ensure quality and avoid duplication.<\/p>\n Scientists from the US Geological Survey, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the International Association of Hydrogeologists and universities in Canada, the United States and Europe should also be brought in. Local construction industries could be involved and provide funds and equipment.<\/p>\n Local and national governments should allocate funds according to scientific importance, guided by of a pool of national experts including hydrogeologists, environmentalists, economists and government officials. Extra funding must be found for environmental and ecological risk assessment and for economic studies of land creation. An independent management organization should be established and supervised by local government to manage and share the research data.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n I concur with this statement.<\/p>\n Li, P., Qian, H. and Wu, J. 2014. Accelerate research on land creation.\u00a0 Nature<\/em>, 510<\/strong>(7503), 29-31.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Moving mountains: a new paper in Nature reveals an enormous programme of mountain top removal in China to create land for development. The landslide potential from such a project is high<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":9869,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":""},"categories":[3,1],"tags":[16,469,787,788],"class_list":["post-9868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-landslide-report","category-uncategorized","tag-china","tag-featured","tag-mountain-top-removal","tag-review-of-a-paper-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9868"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9868\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9868"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9868"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Reference<\/h5>\n