{"id":4004,"date":"2011-12-06T02:31:30","date_gmt":"2011-12-06T02:31:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/?p=4004"},"modified":"2011-12-06T02:31:31","modified_gmt":"2011-12-06T02:31:31","slug":"agu-2-simon-winchester","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2011\/12\/06\/agu-2-simon-winchester\/","title":{"rendered":"AGU 2 &#8211; Simon Winchester"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-4005\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2011\/12\/06\/agu-2-simon-winchester\/11_12-agu-2\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4005\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/12\/11_12-AGU1.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"513\" height=\"129\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/12\/11_12-AGU1.gif 513w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/12\/11_12-AGU1-300x75.gif 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 513px) 100vw, 513px\" \/><\/a>At lunchtime today I went along to the Presidential Forum on the topic of Science and Society, which featured a talk by the author Simon Winchester.\u00a0 On the face of it Simon was a great choice as he has written a number of earth science facing popular science books &#8211; and indeed I have even read two of them.\u00a0 On the other hand I suspect that his presence raised a few eyebrows as back in March he enraged the geoscience community.\u00a0 The context was the Tohuku Earthquake in Japan &#8211; soon after that event he wrote a piece for Newsweek entitled &#8220;<em>The scariest earthquake is yet to come<\/em>&#8221; in which he wrote:<\/p>\n<div>\n<blockquote><p>Even more worrisome than geography  and topography, though, is geological history. For this event cannot be  viewed in isolation. There was a horrifically destructive Pacific  earthquake in New Zealand on Feb. 22, and an even more violent  magnitude-8.8 event in Chile almost exactly a year before. All three  phenomena involved more or less the same family of circum-Pacific fault  lines and plate boundaries\u2014and though there is still no hard scientific  evidence to explain why, there is little doubt now that earthquakes do  tend to occur in clusters: a significant event on one side of a major  tectonic plate is often\u2014not invariably, but often enough to be  noticeable\u2014followed some weeks or months later by another on the plate\u2019s  far side. It is as though the earth becomes like a great brass bell,  which when struck by an enormous hammer blow on one side sets to  vibrating and ringing from all over. Now there have been catastrophic  events at three corners of the Pacific Plate\u2014one in the northwest, on  Friday; one in the southwest, last month; one in the southeast, last  year.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div>\n<p>That leaves just one corner  unaffected\u2014the northeast. And the fault line in the northeast of the  Pacific Plate is the San Andreas Fault, underpinning the city of San  Francisco.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div>\n<blockquote><p>All of which makes the geological  community very apprehensive. All know that the San Andreas Fault is due  to rupture one day\u2014it last did so in 1906, and strains have built  beneath it to a barely tolerable level. To rupture again, with  unimaginable consequences for the millions who live above it, some  triggering event has to occur. Now three events have occurred that might  all be regarded as triggering events. There are in consequence a lot of  thoughtful people in the American West who are very nervous  indeed\u2014wondering, as they often must do, whether the consent that  permits them to inhabit so pleasant a place might be about to be  withdrawn, sooner than they have supposed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<p>It is not hard to see why this caused so much upset in the earth science community.\u00a0 Whilst it is undoubtedly true that the San Andreas fault is dangerous, the suggestion that the Tohuku earthquake in some way meant that this fault was more likely to rupture is not supported by the facts.<\/p>\n<p>It is of course important to remember that Simon Winchester is not a scientist &#8211; indeed he is a career journalist &#8211; and that everyone makes mistakes.\u00a0 As earth scientists we are now in the cross hairs of a whole series of really key science and society issues &#8211; climate change, earth resources, fracking, natural hazards to name just four &#8211; and finding effective ways to communicate our understanding to policy makers and the public is of course vital.\u00a0 So, in that context, Simon was a great choice of a speaker, and I was expecting a really sparky discussion about an issue that is close to my heart (after all, what is a blog for at the end of the day?).<\/p>\n<p>So, it was something of a surprise to me that he chose to spend his talk discussing his recent book on the Atlantic.\u00a0 Don&#8217;t misunderstand me &#8211; he was entertaining, eloquent, witty, engaging and persuasive.\u00a0 He talked with passion and zeal.\u00a0 I ended up really wanting to read his book about the Atlantic.<\/p>\n<p>But&#8230;this was a forum on science and society!\u00a0 I came away intensely frustrated that he had not talked about an issue that is so important to us.\u00a0 When he finished his talk, he gave a five-minute explanation of what led him to write that Newsweek piece, and I for one understood, related to and sympathised with what he had to say.\u00a0 But it is such a shame that he didn&#8217;t use that experience, and his long career as a journalist and a writer, to talk about how to communicate well on challenging topics.\u00a0 I came away thinking that I had heard a great talk, but that it was nonetheless a missed opportunity.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At lunchtime today I went along to the Presidential Forum on the topic of Science and Society, which featured a talk by the author Simon Winchester.\u00a0 On the face of it Simon was a great choice as he has written a number of earth science facing popular science books &#8211; and indeed I have even read two of them.\u00a0 On the other hand I suspect that his presence raised a &hellip;<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on wp_trim_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on wp_trim_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[194,592,971],"class_list":["post-4004","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-agu","tag-climate","tag-presentation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4004","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4004"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4004\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4004"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4004"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4004"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}