{"id":39740,"date":"2021-12-07T08:13:54","date_gmt":"2021-12-07T08:13:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/?p=39740"},"modified":"2021-12-07T08:13:54","modified_gmt":"2021-12-07T08:13:54","slug":"an-update-on-the-mira-mar-landslide-in-albany-australia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2021\/12\/07\/an-update-on-the-mira-mar-landslide-in-albany-australia\/","title":{"rendered":"An update on the Mira Mar landslide in Albany, Australia"},"content":{"rendered":"

An update on the Mira Mar landslide in Albany, Australia<\/h4>\n

In October I wrote about an ongoing landslide that is causing very significant problems<\/a> for the residents of a neighbourhood in the Mira Mar suburb of the city of Albany in the southern part of Australia.\u00a0 At this spot a slow moving landslide has progressively destroyed or damaged a number of houses.\u00a0 The event remains contentious, with claims and counter-claims as to whether the cause is high levels of rainfall or the leakage of a water main<\/a>.\u00a0 The slope has been moving since at least 2013, but it dramatically accelerated in the winter of this year.\u00a0 On 30 July a water main ruptured.<\/p>\n

Last week a geotechnical report was released by a consultant, CMW Geosciences, commissioned by the Great Southern Development Corporation.\u00a0 This has been placed online<\/a>.\u00a0 This is not a detailed site investigation, but it is instead primarily a desk study.\u00a0 However, this site has been extensively studied in recent years, and there is a movement monitoring record for the last few weeks, so the study usefully summarises the state of play.<\/p>\n

Perhaps strangely, the report contains neither an interpreted plan view of the landslide nor an interpreted cross-section.\u00a0 I would be interested to know why this is not present.\u00a0 At the back of the report there are photographs of the landslide, including these images of surface damage:-<\/p>\n

\"Ground

Ground deformation in the Mira Mar landslide in Albany, Australia. Image from a geotechnical report by CMW Geosciences<\/a>.<\/p><\/div>\n

.<\/p>\n

The report concludes that the landslide is complex, active and extending in size.\u00a0 It also notes that groundwater is likely to be the cause of the landslide, but it is clear that it is not possible to determine whether the source was rainfall or leakage.\u00a0 The report recommends that dewatering of the landslide is enhanced.\u00a0 In the short term the report recommends that two houses (10 and 12 Sleeman Avenue – see image below) are demolished – the damage to the houses means that they are unsafe and demolition would provide access for investigation and remediation.\u00a0 Finally the report recommends a more detailed investigation, using Lidar to understand the topography and morphology of the slope, and boreholes to understand the subsurface geometry, materials and pore water pressures.\u00a0 All of these recommendations seem reasonable.<\/p>\n

\"Damage

Damage to a house caused by the Mira Mar landslide. Image from ABC Great Southern: Tom Edwards<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

.<\/p>\n

The Minister for Regional Government has provided a response to the report<\/a> that indicates that a further three properties will be evacuated, that AUS$150,000 will be made available for further investigations and that dewatering will be supported.\u00a0 It is probably true to say that the response has not been welcomed by those affected by the landslide<\/a>.<\/p>\n

This event is a nightmare for the residents of the properties on the landslide, and for those living around it.\u00a0 The report is correct in noting that the long term solution will need to address the stability of the whole landslide system, not individual properties.\u00a0 This is entirely possible from an engineering perspective, but it will be complex and expensive, and will require a long period of investigation, planning and construction.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Mira Mar landslide in Albany, Australia continues to move, causing extensive damage to a number of houses. Two properties will now be demolished.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":39746,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[176,469,30672,959,30661],"class_list":["post-39740","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-landslide-report","tag-australia","tag-featured","tag-houses","tag-landslide-report","tag-residential"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39740","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39740"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39740\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39746"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39740"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39740"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39740"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}