{"id":33549,"date":"2020-04-04T09:21:20","date_gmt":"2020-04-04T09:21:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/?p=33549"},"modified":"2020-04-04T09:21:20","modified_gmt":"2020-04-04T09:21:20","slug":"milli-fire-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2020\/04\/04\/milli-fire-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Debris flows after wildfires &#8211; an example from the Milli Fire in Oregon"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Debris flows after wildfires &#8211; an example from the Milli Fire in Oregon<\/h4>\n<p>It is well established that debris flows can be a major hazard in the aftermath of wildfires.\u00a0 There are numerous examples, but perhaps the best known are the <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2018\/01\/16\/montecito-debris-flows-1\/\">2018 Montecito debris flows in California<\/a>, which killed <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/2018_Southern_California_mudflows\">23 people in 2018<\/a>. As wildfire frequency and intensity increases as a result of global heating, understanding this phenomenon better is important.<\/p>\n<p>There is a very nice case study just published in the journal <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/journal\/10346\"><em>Landslides<\/em><\/a> (<a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10346-020-01376-9\">Wall <em>et al.<\/em> 2020<\/a>) examining a large-scale debris flow after the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Milli_Fire\">Milli Fire in Oregon<\/a>.\u00a0 This was a large fire &#8211; it burnt about 97 km\u00b2 of\u00a0 forest in the Oregon Cascade Range in 2017.\u00a0 The fire was initiated by a lightning strike on 11 August 2017 and the fire was not fully contained until 24 September. In the aftermath of the fire, the <a href=\"https:\/\/landslides.usgs.gov\/hazards\/postfire_debrisflow\/detail.php?objectid=118\">USGS highlighted that there was a significant risk of debris flows in the fire burnt area<\/a>:-<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_33552\" style=\"width: 809px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-33552\" class=\" wp-image-33552\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2020\/04\/20_04-Milli-1.jpg\" alt=\"Debris flow assessment of the Milli Fire\" width=\"799\" height=\"532\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2020\/04\/20_04-Milli-1.jpg 1901w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2020\/04\/20_04-Milli-1-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2020\/04\/20_04-Milli-1-1024x682.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2020\/04\/20_04-Milli-1-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2020\/04\/20_04-Milli-1-1536x1023.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 799px) 100vw, 799px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-33552\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><a href=\"https:\/\/landslides.usgs.gov\/hazards\/postfire_debrisflow\/detail.php?objectid=118\">USGS debris flow hazard assessment of the Milli Fire.<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<p>.<\/p>\n<p>On 20 June 2018 the burnt area suffered significant rainfall.\u00a0 A debris flow initiated on the flanks of Black Crater, traveling 1.5 km.\u00a0 In the paper, the authors provide the following maps that show the scale of the debris flow, the topography over which it traveled and the degree of burn in the Milli Fire:-<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_33554\" style=\"width: 609px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-33554\" class=\" wp-image-33554\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2020\/04\/20_04-Milli-2.jpg\" alt=\"Maps of the Milli Fire debris flow\" width=\"599\" height=\"797\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2020\/04\/20_04-Milli-2.jpg 959w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2020\/04\/20_04-Milli-2-226x300.jpg 226w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2020\/04\/20_04-Milli-2-770x1024.jpg 770w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2020\/04\/20_04-Milli-2-768x1021.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, 599px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-33554\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Maps of the Milli Fire debris flow from <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10346-020-01376-9\">Wall <em>et al.<\/em> (2020)<\/a>.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>.<\/p>\n<p>As the first map shows, much of the debris flow source area was severely burnt in the Milli Fire. The authors note that by summer 2018 very little revegetation had occurred. The authors measured the infiltration capacity of the soil &#8211; the mean value was 23.6 mm per hour. During the storm, local rain gauges measured a peak rainfall rate of 27.9 mm per hour. The authors deduce that the excess rainfall generated overland flow that initiated the debris flow.<\/p>\n<p>In the conclusion, <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10346-020-01376-9\">Wall <em>et al.<\/em> (2020)<\/a> give a stark warning about debris flow risk in the mountainous areas of the NW USA:<\/p>\n<p><em>As fire seasons lengthen and fire intensity increases across the Pacific Northwest as a result of climate change, this region may become more susceptible to runoff-initiated debris flows.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Sadly, this applies in may other areas as well.<\/p>\n<h4>Reference<\/h4>\n<p>Wall, S.A., Roering, J.J. &amp; Rengers, F.K. 2020. <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10346-020-01376-9\">Runoff-initiated post-fire debris flow Western Cascades, Oregon<\/a>. <i>Landslides<\/i>.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a paper published in the journal Landslides, Wall et al. (2020) describe a large debris flow triggered by heavy rainfall after the Milli Fire in Oregon.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on wp_trim_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on wp_trim_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":33554,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[544],"tags":[469,189,192,17,48,170],"class_list":["post-33549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-review-of-a-paper","tag-featured","tag-oregon","tag-paper","tag-research","tag-usa","tag-wildfire"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33549\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33554"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}