{"id":3192,"date":"2011-06-14T07:24:39","date_gmt":"2011-06-14T07:24:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/?p=3192"},"modified":"2011-06-14T07:24:55","modified_gmt":"2011-06-14T07:24:55","slug":"rockfalls-from-m6-0-aftershock-in-christchurch-new-zealand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2011\/06\/14\/rockfalls-from-m6-0-aftershock-in-christchurch-new-zealand\/","title":{"rendered":"Rockfalls from M=6.3 aftershock in Christchurch, New Zealand"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Christchurch was again affected by two large aftershocks yesterday.\u00a0 At 1 pm local time a M=5.6 earthquake occurred, followed at 2:20 pm by a M=6.3 event.\u00a0 Even though these are technically aftershocks from the Darfield event last year, the latter was of course a substantive earhquake in its own right.\u00a0 The map below, <a href=\"http:\/\/images.geonet.org.nz\/maps\/quakes\/262-christchurch-quake.jpg\">from Geonet<\/a>, shows the distribution of the aftershocks that have occurred in the Christchurch area over the last 60 days:<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-3193\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2011\/06\/14\/rockfalls-from-m6-0-aftershock-in-christchurch-new-zealand\/262-christchurch-quake\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-3193\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/262-christchurch-quake.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"483\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/262-christchurch-quake.jpg 819w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/262-christchurch-quake-300x241.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The map below is a Google Earth image of the aftershocks of the last 24 hours:<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-3194\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2011\/06\/14\/rockfalls-from-m6-0-aftershock-in-christchurch-new-zealand\/11_06-christchurch-aftershocks-1\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-3194\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"639\" height=\"423\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-1.jpg 1444w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-1-300x198.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-1-1024x678.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>A few interesting things to note here i.\u00a0 First, this cluster of very shallow events is continuing to occur to the east of the main Darfield shock last September, which was well to the west of the city.\u00a0 Second, this cluster us occurring beneath the Sumner peninsular, which is an area that is characterised by steep slopes, as a zoom in of the Google Earth image (still with the aftershocks displayed) demonstrates:<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-3195\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2011\/06\/14\/rockfalls-from-m6-0-aftershock-in-christchurch-new-zealand\/11_06-christchurch-aftershocks-2\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-3195\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"641\" height=\"425\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-2.jpg 1444w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-2-300x198.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-2-1024x678.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 641px) 100vw, 641px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>But most remarkable is the exceptionally high ground accelerations that have again been associated with these events.\u00a0 The following is the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.geonet.org.nz\/var\/storage\/images\/media\/images\/news\/2011\/june_2_pga\/58225-2-eng-GB\/june_2_pga.png\">Geonet map<\/a> of the peak ground accelerations associated with the larger of the two events:<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-3196\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2011\/06\/14\/rockfalls-from-m6-0-aftershock-in-christchurch-new-zealand\/june_2_pga\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-3196\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/june_2_pga.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"639\" height=\"483\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/june_2_pga.png 1271w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/june_2_pga-300x227.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/june_2_pga-1024x775.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Note that in the Sumner area a peak ground acceleration of over 2 g was recorded!This is really very high indeed for an earthquake of this magnitude.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stuff.co.nz\/the-press\/news\/christchurch-earthquake-2011\/5139229\/Parker-not-worried-about-exodus-after-quakes\">Initial reports<\/a> suggest that the event may have been associated with movement on another unmapped fault.\u00a0 The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stuff.co.nz\/the-press\/news\/christchurch-earthquake-2011\/5139229\/Parker-not-worried-about-exodus-after-quakes\">same article<\/a> has some images of the damage associated with rockfalls. The first shows the immediate aftermath of a coastal rockfall event:<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-3199\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2011\/06\/14\/rockfalls-from-m6-0-aftershock-in-christchurch-new-zealand\/11_06-christchurch-aftershocks-3b\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-3199\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-3b.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"596\" height=\"398\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-3b.jpg 596w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-3b-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 596px) 100vw, 596px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Whilst the second shows the aftermath in terms of the impact on a clifftop home:<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-3198\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2011\/06\/14\/rockfalls-from-m6-0-aftershock-in-christchurch-new-zealand\/11_06-christchurch-aftershocks-4\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-3198\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-4.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"595\" height=\"397\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-4.jpg 595w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-4-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 595px) 100vw, 595px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>There is also quite a nice article about the impacts of the rockfalls on people at the foot of the cliffs <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stuff.co.nz\/the-press\/news\/christchurch-earthquake-2011\/5143235\/Massive-boulders-narrow-miss\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, the magnitude of the problems in the Christchurch area is calling for some novel solution to rockfall problems.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nzherald.co.nz\/business\/news\/article.cfm?c_id=3&amp;objectid=10732093\">NZ Herald<\/a> has a piece on the use of shipping containers as a temporary but highly effective rockfall protection measure:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_3200\" style=\"width: 470px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-3200\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2011\/06\/14\/rockfalls-from-m6-0-aftershock-in-christchurch-new-zealand\/11_06-christchurch-aftershocks-5\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3200\" class=\"size-full wp-image-3200\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-5.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"460\" height=\"230\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-5.jpg 460w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/06\/11_06-Christchurch-aftershocks-5-300x150.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 460px) 100vw, 460px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3200\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">http:\/\/www.nzherald.co.nz\/business\/news\/article.cfm?c_id=3&amp;objectid=10732093<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Comments and\/or observations from anyone in the area would be very welcome!\u00a0 I will heading down to New Zealand next month.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dave provides a brief review of the high levels of shaking associated with the M=6.3 earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand yesterday, and examines the rockfalls that were the result.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on wp_trim_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on wp_trim_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":3194,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":""},"categories":[537],"tags":[22,23,469,7,56],"class_list":["post-3192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-earthquake-induced-landslide","tag-christchurch","tag-earthquake","tag-featured","tag-new-zealand","tag-rockfall"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3192"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3192\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3194"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}