{"id":2611,"date":"2011-02-22T02:39:35","date_gmt":"2011-02-22T02:39:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/?p=2611"},"modified":"2011-02-22T02:39:35","modified_gmt":"2011-02-22T02:39:35","slug":"first-news-of-the-mw6-3-earthquake-in-christchurch-new-zealand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2011\/02\/22\/first-news-of-the-mw6-3-earthquake-in-christchurch-new-zealand\/","title":{"rendered":"First news of the Mw=6.3 earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Christchurch in New Zealand was once again hit by an earthquake today, with the event happening at 12:51 pm local time (23:51 UT on 21st Feb).\u00a0 As usual, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.geonet.org.nz\/earthquake\/quakes\/3468575g.html\">Geonet site<\/a> is the best place for up to date information about this event.\u00a0 At the time of writing (just over two hours after the earthquake, the location report is as follows:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Christchurch-earthquake.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-2612\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Christchurch-earthquake.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Christchurch-earthquake.png 400w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Christchurch-earthquake-300x225.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>A Google Earth image of the location of the epicentre shows why this earthquake is likely to have had a huge impact:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-New-Zealand-2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-2613\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-New-Zealand-2-1024x697.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"340\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-New-Zealand-2-1024x697.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-New-Zealand-2-300x204.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-New-Zealand-2.jpg 1036w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Note the reported location of the earthquake at the foot of the image.\u00a0 In essence this is a bulls-eye hit of a substantial event on the city.\u00a0 The Geonet reported magnitude is 6.3 (note that this is likely to change over the next few hours as the data improves), but the depth is very shallow (only 5 km).\u00a0 The consequence is high levels of shaking in the city centre.\u00a0 The Geonet shaking intensity map is based upon instrument data and reports by people on the ground.\u00a0 As I write the map looks like this:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Geonet-felt-map.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-2614\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Geonet-felt-map.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"595\" height=\"589\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Geonet-felt-map.jpg 595w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Geonet-felt-map-300x296.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 595px) 100vw, 595px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The squares are the instrument data, and the circles the eye-witness reports.\u00a0 The red squares indicate MM=8 and the orange ones MM=7.\u00a0 Christcurch itself is in the MM=7 zone, which in terms of buildings is &#8220;damaging&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Christchurch is probably the most &#8220;English&#8221; city in Australasia, which means actually that there are at least some masonry buildings.\u00a0 An example is the cathedral &#8211; the picture pair below shows after (from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/world\/multiple-deaths-reported-after-quake-hits-christchurch-20110222-1b356.html\">here<\/a>) and a file image from before the event:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Christchurch-cathedral.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-2615\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Christchurch-cathedral.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"633\" height=\"356\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Christchurch-cathedral.jpg 703w, https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2011\/02\/11_02-Christchurch-cathedral-300x168.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 633px) 100vw, 633px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The likely impact of the earthquake is likely to have been exacerbated by the timing in the middle of the day, which means that many people will have been in the street (unlike the September 2010 (Darfield) event, which occurred very late at night).\u00a0 This means that many more people will have been in the way of collapsing buildings, breaking glass, etc.\u00a0 Fatalities are very likely as a consequence.\u00a0 Liquefaction was also a major issue in the Darfield earthquake, and is likely to be a major problem in this case too.<\/p>\n<p>Readers may be interested in my images from the aftermath of the September 2010 (Darfield) event, which can be found <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2010\/11\/02\/the-canterbury-earthquake-images-of-the-distorted-railway-line\/\">here (the famous railway line images)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2010\/09\/18\/images-of-the-darfield-canterbury-earthquake-fault-rupture\/\">here (the fault rupture)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2010\/09\/19\/earthquake-damage-in-christchurch-an-ironic-billboard\/\">here (building damage)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An initial evaluation of the Mw = 6.3 earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand this morning.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on wp_trim_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on wp_trim_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":2615,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[526,469,7],"class_list":["post-2611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-earthquake-report","tag-featured","tag-new-zealand"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2611\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2615"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}