Commercial satellite imagery from Planet, obtained the day after North Korea conducted its largest test to date (currently estimated in the 100+ kiloton range), appears to show numerous landslides throughout the Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site and beyond<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
And they have produced this image:-<\/p>\n
38 North<\/a> and Planet Labs<\/a> imagery of the site of the North Korea nuclear weapons test. Image collected after the test showing landslides triggered by the underground blast.<\/p><\/div>\n
.<\/p>\n
This appears to be interpreted in some quarters to indicate that the weapon was particularly large.\u00a0 For example, Newser has the headline<\/a>:<\/p>\n
Landslides suggest N. Korea’s latest test was a monster<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
This is a Planet Labs image<\/a> from 6th September (i.e. today) showing the area of Mount Mantap affected by the underground nuclear weapons test:-<\/p>\n
Planet Labs<\/a> image of 6th September 2017 showing the area affected by the North Korea nuclear weapon test<\/p><\/div>\n
.<\/p>\n
This is the same area on a Planet Labs image<\/a> dated 26th August, definitely collected before the most recent weapons test:<\/p>\n
Planet Labs<\/a> image of the area affected by the North Korea nuclear weapon test. Image collected on 26th August 2017, prior to the test<\/p><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
There are undoubtedly some new landslides in the post-test image, although most of the larger ones in the imagery were pre-existing.\u00a0 The new landslides appear to be mostly small, and they are focused close to the channel, perhaps where there is either accumulated debris or steeper slopes due to incision.\u00a0 There are a few larger events in the gully systems.\u00a0 It is not the case, as far as I can see, that there is very extensive landsliding in the area affected by the nuclear weapons test – certainly not on the scale that we see from major earthquakes in mountainous areas<\/a>.<\/p>\n
That underground nuclear weapons tests trigger landslides in local mountain areas is not new, and nor is it surprising.\u00a0 The explosion induces ground shaking that is similar in some ways to an earthquake, although the nature of the shaking itself is quite different.\u00a0 In fact, the North Korean landslides are very localised and small compared with some other examples.\u00a0 In a book chapter that is partly online, the Russian landslide scientist V.V. Adushkin describes rock avalanches<\/a> triggered by eight different underground nuclear weapons tests at the Soviet Novaya Zemlia test site during the subterranean weapon testing programme there.\u00a0 Two of these were enormous – the largest had a volume of 80 million m\u00b3, whilst another had a volume of 5 million m\u00b3.\u00a0 This is clearly very much larger than the landslides in North Korea.<\/p>\n
Thus, although the landslides triggered by this test are interesting, they are neither surprising nor exceptional.\u00a0 If North Korea develops larger weapons then we are likely to see bigger landslides, although this is the least of our worries perhaps.\u00a0 As an aside, Fox News and few other agencies<\/a> are reporting Chinese scientists as indicating that they have concerns about collapse of the mountain in the event of another test.\u00a0 If this is the case I find it surprising that there are not more landslides on the massif, but I do not know the grounds for their suggestions.<\/p>\n
Acknowledgement<\/h4>\n
![\"North](\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2017\/09\/17_09-North-Korea-1-e1504708516897.jpg\")
![\"North](\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2017\/09\/17_09-North-Korea-2-e1504709683679.jpg\")
![\"North](\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2017\/09\/17_09-North-Korea-3-e1504709939298.jpg\")