{"id":20844,"date":"2016-12-27T10:02:26","date_gmt":"2016-12-27T10:02:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/?p=20844"},"modified":"2016-12-27T17:40:04","modified_gmt":"2016-12-27T17:40:04","slug":"safeland-project-reports-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/2016\/12\/27\/safeland-project-reports-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Safeland project reports on landslide hazard and risk management"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Safeland\"

The Safeland Project reports<\/p><\/div>\n

The Safeland project reports<\/h5>\n

Safeland was an EU funded project<\/a> that ran from 2010 to 2012 that sought to develop quantitative risk assessment and management tools and strategies for landslides across Europe at a range of scales.\u00a0 Coordinated by the NGI in Norway<\/a> and including a glittering cast of landslide research organisations from across Europe, it was a highly successful collaborative programme.\u00a0 I do not think there has been a project like it before or after.\u00a0 Whilst the project is now complete, the research continues to have a significant impact.<\/p>\n

One of the legacies of Safeland is a set of project reports that are singularly impressive documents for the most-part.\u00a0 Sadly, for some time these were not available online as the original Safeland project site was hacked.\u00a0 I am delighted to say though that a new portal has been established<\/a>, and all of these reports are available for download once more.<\/p>\n

This is the full set of reports with embedded links to the PDF document:<\/p>\n

Work Area 1:<\/h3>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Improving knowledge on landslide hazard (triggering and run-out models)<\/h4>\n

Deliverable 1.1: Landslide triggering mechanisms in Europe \u2013 Overview and State of the Art<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 1.2: Geomechanical modelling of slope deformation and failure processes driven by climatic factors: shallow landslides, deep landslides and debris flows<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 1.3: Analysis of the results of laboratory experiments and of monitoring in test sites for assessment of the slope response to precipitation and alidation of prediction models<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 1.4: Guidelines for use of numerical codes for prediction of climate-induced landslides<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 1.5: Statistical and empirical models for prediction of precipitation-induced landslides<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 1.6: Analysis of landslides triggered by anthropogenic factors in Europe<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 1.7: Landslide runout: Review of analytical\/empirical models for subaerial slides, submarine slides and snow avalanche. Numerical modelling. Software tools, material models, validation and enchmarking for selected case studies<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 1.8: Guidelines: recommended models of landslide triggering processes and run-out to be used in QRA<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 1.9: Recommendations for run out models for use in landslide hazard and risk mapping<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Work Area 2:<\/h3>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Quantitative risk assessment (QRA)<\/h4>\n

Deliverable 2.1: Overview of landslide hazard and risk assessment practices<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.2a: Examples of international practice in landslide hazard and risk mapping. Assessing the state of art of landslide hazard and risk assessment in the P.R. of China<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.2b: Harmonisation and development of procedures for quantifying landslide hazard<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.3: Overview of European landslide databases and recommendations for interoperability and harmonisation of landslide databases<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.4: Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk assessment and zoning<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.5: Physical vulnerability of elements at risk to landslides: Methodology for evaluation, fragility curves and damage states for buildings and lifelines<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.6: Methodology for evaluation of the socio-economic impact of landslides (socio-economic vulnerability)<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.7a: Case studies of environmental and societal impact of landslides \u2013 Part A: Rev. Case studies for environmental (physical) vulnerability<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.7b: Case studies of environmental and societal impact of landslides – Part B: Case studies for socio-economic vulnerability<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.8: Recommended Procedures for Validating Landslide Hazard and Risk Models and Maps<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.9: Toolbox for landslide quantitative risks assessment<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.10: Identification of landslide hazard and risk “hotspots” in Europe<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 2.11: QRA case studies at selected “hotspots”. Synthesis of critical issues<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Work Area 3:<\/h3>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Quantying global change scenarios (climatic and anthropogenic) and their impact on landslide hazard and risk in the future<\/h4>\n

Deliverable 3.1: Overview on and post-processing of available climate change simulations for Europe on a spatial scale of 25km with a special focus on meteorological extreme events<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 3.2: REMO climate change simulations with 10km horizontal resolution for case study sites in Southern Italy, the Alps, Southern Norway, and Romania<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 3.3: Analysis of selected extreme precipitation events with the COSMO-CLM model on a spatial scale of 2.8 km<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 3.4: Report on projected changes in meteorological extreme events in Europe with a focus on Southern Italy, the Alps, Southern Norway, and Romania:\u00a0 Synthesis of results<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 3.5: Overview and interpretation of available data and information on human activity and demographic evolution<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 3.6: Database of human activity factors affecting the local landslide risk at selected sites (including maps of controlling factors and changes in these factors; land cover, demographic and economic scenarios; trajectory of key indicator of changes)<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 3.7: Expected changes in climate-driven landslide activity (magnitude, frequency) in Europe in the next 100 years<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 3.8: Changing pattern in climate-driven landslide hazard at selected sites in Europe (focus on Southern Italy, the Alps and Southern Norway) in the next 50 years<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 3.9: Methodology for predicting the changes in the landslide risk during the next 50 years at selected sites in Europe. Changing pattern of landslide risk in hotspot and evolution trends in Europe according to global change scenarios.<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Work Area 4:<\/h3>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Development of monitoring technology, especially early warning systems and remote sensing techniques, and applications<\/h4>\n

Deliverable 4.1: Review of Techniques for Landslide Detection, Fast Characterization, Rapid Mapping and Long-Term Monitoring<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 4.2: Short-term weather forecasting for shallow landslide prediction \u2013 Methodology, evaluation of technologies and validation at selected test sites<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 4.3: Creation and updating of landslide inventory maps, landslide deformation maps and hazard maps as input for QRA using remote-sensing technology<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 4.4: Guidelines for the selection of appropriate remote sensing technologies for monitoring different types of landslides<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 4.5: Evaluation report on innovative monitoring and remote sensing methods and future technology<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 4.6: Report on evaluation of mass\u00a0movement indicators<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 4.7: Report on the development of software for early warning based on real-time data<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 4.8: Guidelines for landslide monitoring and early warning systems in Europe \u2013 Design and required technology<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Work Area 5:<\/h3>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Risk management, including toolbox or appropriate hazard and risk mitigation measures and stakeholder process for risk management<\/h4>\n

Deliverable 5.1: Compendium of tested and innovative structural, non-structural and risk-transfer mitigation measures for different landslide types<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 5.2: Toolbox of landslide mitigation measures<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 5.3: Quantitative risk-cost-benefit analysis of selected mitigation options for two case studies<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 5.4: Quantification of uncertainties in the risk assessment and management process<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 5.5: Five scoping studies of the policy issues, political culture and stakeholder views in the selected case study sites \u2013 description of methodology and comparative synthesis report<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 5.6: Development and testing of spatial multi-criteria evaluation for selected case sites<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 5.7: Design and testing: a risk communication strategy and a deliberative process for choosing a set of mitigation and prevention measures<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Work Package 6:<\/h3>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Demonstration sites and case studies for verification\/calibration of models and scenarios<\/h4>\n

Deliverable 6.1: Validation form and monograph of monitored sites and case studies<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Work Package 8:<\/h3>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Project management and co-ordination<\/h4>\n

Deliverable 0.1: Living with landslides \u2013 European and international dimensions of the project<\/a><\/p>\n

Deliverable 0.3: Dealing with uncertainties in modelling, prediction, and decision-making<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The full set of project reports about landslide hazard and risk management from the EU FP7 Safeland project are now available online once more.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":20846,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":""},"categories":[3,608],"tags":[144,469,503,1228,398],"class_list":["post-20844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-landslide-report","category-research-project","tag-europe","tag-featured","tag-hazard","tag-landslide-risk","tag-report"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20844"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20844\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}