![](\"https:\/\/blogs.agu.org\/landslideblog\/files\/2010\/10\/10_05-Freeboard-week-recalculated-4.jpg\")
<\/a><\/div>\nAt the current rate of increase the freeboard will be lost in two to three days, but as before we are reliant upon these figures being correct. This episode of incorrect freeboard measurement does not reflect well on NDMA, given the importance of these numbers. Of course, the fact that the saddle is located at a higher elevation means that the lake volume will be larger – i.e. it increases the size of the potential flood.<\/p>\n
Of great concern to me though is the continued problem of closure of the spillway. It is clear that the banks of the spillway are failing in multiple locations. These failures are progressively closing the spillway, as this Focus image, taken of the spillway banks yesterday morning, shows:<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/div>\nThe concern would be that the spillway closes completely before the water level reaches this level, which would effectively increase the freeboard once again, albeit probably briefly. In effect we are in a high stakes race between the rate of water level rise and the rate of closure of the spillway. The strength of the clay material forming the spillway banks is clearly low, as we believed from the start. Either way, the spillway is clearly completely incapable of handling the flow, so erosion is inevitable. The one bright spot is that the failed banks may erode preferentially, allowing the channel to widen more rapidly than it down-cuts, as happened at Tangjiashan. <\/p>\n
Finally, lets not forget the hardship that this crisis is imposing on the local people. The Pamir Times<\/a> today puiblished this image of a camp for Internally Displaced People (IDPs):<\/p>\n