22 December 2015
This is the latest in a series of dispatches from scientists and education officers aboard the Schmidt Ocean Institute’s R/V Falkor. On this voyage, scientists aboard the research vessel Falkor hoped to shed light on the Mariana Back-arc, which was expected to be teeming with activity and life. Over the course of their 27 day mission at sea they explored the back-arc spreading center to find new sites of hydrothermal activity and to better understand the physical, chemical, and geological forces that shape biodiversity in these unique ecosystems. Read more posts here.
Note: This post has been corrected. The original version had an image that was not relevant as well as incorrect radar altimetry information.
by Susan G. Merle
Opening Google Earth and looking at the seafloor graphics, it is easy to get the impression that we know what the entire ocean bottom looks like. You can see underwater mountains (seamounts), deep valleys (trenches) and the general lay of the “land.” The majority of the data on the ocean floor is actually derived from radar altimetry acquired by satellites (1,850 meters resolution).
Data resolution is a measure of the accuracy or detail that one can resolve. The sea surface measured by satellites actually rises above seamounts and falls above trenches due to Earth’s gravity. It is this small difference in height (a few centimeters) that is used to estimate depth values for the 90 percent of the world’s oceans that have not been mapped by ships.
Only about 10 percent of the seafloor has been mapped with ship’s sonar, and those surveys vary in resolution from ~10 meters nearshore (33 feet) to ~100 meters (330 feet) in the deepest regions of the ocean. High-resolution (1 meter or less) ocean floor data can be collected with remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) and autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) “flying” close to the seafloor, but those vehicles can only map small areas, and are not practical for mapping wide swaths of the ocean floor. Areas where ship sonar data have been gathered are incorporated with the satellite data, providing a better picture of the seafloor – but this is still in orders of magnitude less detail than what is available on land.
A Lack of Data
The lack of high-resolution seafloor data became tragically clear when the Malaysian airline jet MH370 went down in the Indian Ocean in 2014. There were no high-resolution ocean bottom maps available in the search area, which made locating the lost airliner effectively impossible. Much of the effort since then has been directed to surveying that part of the ocean floor. We know more about what the surface of the moon looks like than the bottom of the ocean, which is 70 percent of our planet. Perhaps it is time to search for new worlds right here on our planet, beneath the waves, on the ocean floor.
Susan G. Merle is a senior research assistant at Oregon State University’s Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources Studies as part of the NOAA EOI (Earth-Ocean Interactions) Program.