<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan&#039;s Wild Wild Science Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience</link>
	<description>By Dan Satterfield</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:18:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>99% of Scientific Papers Agree On Climate Threat.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/18/99-of-scientific-papers-agree-on-climate-threat/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/18/99-of-scientific-papers-agree-on-climate-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Satterfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/?p=15952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend John Cook, (an Australian Physicist who runs the superb website Skeptical Science) is the lead author of a paper in the AGU journal Geophysical Research Letters that has gotten worldwide attention this past week. Not because the findings are a surprise to the science community, but because the public is surprised! THE GREAT AMERICAN DISCONNECT Dr. Ed Maibach at the George Mason University Center for Climate Change knows exactly how bug a &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/18/99-of-scientific-papers-agree-on-climate-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://brightcove.vo.llnwd.net/pd16/media/105920850001/105920850001_2384375995001_abstract-video-a85bc4639953b863645ceb13c2f6641b-converted.mp4" length="12318050" type="video/mp4" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thunderstorms and Cities: Is there a connection?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/17/thunderstorms-and-cities-is-there-a-connection/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/17/thunderstorms-and-cities-is-there-a-connection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Satterfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[severe weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/?p=15942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest Post from Bob Ryan Meteorologist for WJLA TV in Washington DC (This post appeared on the WJLA Weather Blog) Are cities changing summer thunderstorms? &#160; This is a follow-up blog to a story I had on our 11PM news Tuesday May 14.  You can see the actual story below but I wanted to expand a few things beyond 1 minute and 30 seconds. Here&#8217;s the tease :&#62;).  Do you live in &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/17/thunderstorms-and-cities-is-there-a-connection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CHARGES DROPPED!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/16/charges-dropped/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/16/charges-dropped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Satterfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/?p=15937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It still leaves one with serious concerns about the critical thinking skills of the administrators in the Bartow County school system.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/16/charges-dropped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Circumscribed Halo over Ocean City In Maryland On Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/15/circumzenithal-arc-over-ocean-city-in-maryland-on-tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/15/circumzenithal-arc-over-ocean-city-in-maryland-on-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Satterfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clouds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/?p=15930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correction: Hat tip to Daniel Linek who spotted my mistake. This is a CIRCUMSCRIBED Halo. Not a Circumzenithal Arc . See here: http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/circum.htm The title to this post has also been corrected. You can read more about this on the great Atmospheric Optics site: http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/cza.htm I saw one in Greenland (and at the South Pole for a few seconds). The bottom band I believe is a circumhorizon arc.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/15/circumzenithal-arc-over-ocean-city-in-maryland-on-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Cooling Is A Silly Myth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/14/global-cooling-is-a-silly-myth/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/14/global-cooling-is-a-silly-myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 06:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Satterfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/?p=15920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Cook over at Skeptical Science has produced an excellent video, that explains why anyone who telling you the climate has stopped warming, or that the planet is now cooling is wrong.  Utterly wrong. It&#8217;s in the same league as HAARP and Chem-trails.  This video comes out in the same week that the Wall Street Journal published an op-ed by William Happer and Harrison Schmidt that contained all the usual canards. All of &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/14/global-cooling-is-a-silly-myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Turbulence of Van Gogh and the Labrador Shelf Current</title>
		<link>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/11/the-turbulence-of-van-gogh-and-the-labrador-shelf-current/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/11/the-turbulence-of-van-gogh-and-the-labrador-shelf-current/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 07:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Satterfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic Ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic Sea Ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art and science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starry Night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VanGogh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/?p=15910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a guest post by Andreas Muenchow at Icy Seas. Vincent Van Gogh painted his most turbulent images when insane. The Labrador Current resembles Van Gogh’s paintings when it becomes unstable. There is no reason that mental and geophysical instability relate to each other. And yet they do. Russian physicist Andrey Kolmogorov developed theories of turbulence 70 years ago that Mexican physicist applied to some of Van Gogh’s paintings such as “Starry Sky:” Vincent Van Gogh’s “Starry Sky” painted in June 1889. &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/11/the-turbulence-of-van-gogh-and-the-labrador-shelf-current/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future Of Weather Forecasting Is Under Construction</title>
		<link>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/10/the-future-of-weather-forecasting-is-under-construction/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/10/the-future-of-weather-forecasting-is-under-construction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 01:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Satterfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOES R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hurricane sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[severe weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/?p=15861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every summer, thousands of people drive out to Chincoteague in Virginia to see the beautiful beach, wild ponies, and the stunning National Wildlife Refuge. To get there, they drive around the long NASA runway at the Wallops Island Flight facility, and you can&#8217;t help noticing the cluster of big satellite dishes. If you&#8217;ve been there, you probably have wondered just what all those dishes are for. Meteorologists already know, and you&#8217;re about to find &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/10/the-future-of-weather-forecasting-is-under-construction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Voyager One Left The Heliosphere?? Maybe Not, But It&#8217;s Close.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/08/has-voyager-one-left-the-heliosphere-maybe-not-but-its-close/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/08/has-voyager-one-left-the-heliosphere-maybe-not-but-its-close/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 05:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Satterfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/?p=15856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit late on spotting this bit in case you have not seen it: Voyager 1 has entered a new region of space, sudden changes in cosmic rays indicate 20 March 2013 AGU Release No. 13-11 For Immediate Release WASHINGTON – Thirty-five years after its launch, Voyager 1 appears to have travelled beyond the influence of the Sun and exited the heliosphere, according to a new study appearing online today. &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/08/has-voyager-one-left-the-heliosphere-maybe-not-but-its-close/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Think Like a Scientist and Why You Should</title>
		<link>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/05/how-to-think-like-a-scientist-and-why-you-should/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/05/how-to-think-like-a-scientist-and-why-you-should/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 05:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Satterfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vitamin D]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/?p=15839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anecdotal evidence can be very interesting, and it can lead to great discoveries, but it&#8217;s usually false. Unfortunately, many people make almost all of their decisions based on it. In some rare cases it&#8217;s almost a necessity, but in most you do not, and certainly should not. To a scientist, anecdotal evidence says something along the lines of &#8220;hey, I wonder if someone has tested this scientifically and discovered what the truth &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/05/how-to-think-like-a-scientist-and-why-you-should/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Carbon Dioxide Levels Approaching 400 PPM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/03/global-carbon-dioxide-levels-approaching-400-ppm/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/03/global-carbon-dioxide-levels-approaching-400-ppm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 08:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Satterfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keeling curve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/?p=15827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are very near passing a milestone. The CO2 levels will likely soon reach 400 ppm at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii. The curve of course is named after Charles Keeling who started the measurements in 1958. They started it because even then there was concern that we might be dangerously interfering with our climate by burning fossil fuels. They just did not know, and when scientists do not know, they &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/2013/05/03/global-carbon-dioxide-levels-approaching-400-ppm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
