17 February 2014

A marine incursion in the Hampshire Formation?

Posted by Callan

I went out last Tuesday to Corridor H, the exemplary new highway cutting through the Valley and Ridge province of eastern West Virginia. Joining me was former student Alan Pitts, a devotee of Corridor H from way back in the early days when we just called it “New Route 55.”

The boondoggle highway is now open all the way west to the Allegheny Front, practically into the Canaan Valley. On Tuesday, we went all the way to physiographic boundary, right near the big line of windmills that marks the transition from the Appalachian Plateaus to the first valley of the Valley & Ridge. This is the first of several posts of the new stuff we saw on that field trip.

The steam plume you see in the photo below is the coal-fired power plant at Mount Storm. Note the red beds (Hampshire Formation, presumably) and the snow cover:

IMG_1793

The westernmost outcrop we examined in detail is this one, which we inferred to be the Hampshire Formation (Devonian red beds / molasse), a 2000-foot-thick stack of fluvial and floodplain sediments deposited on a massive delta complex that extended westward into the Kaskaskia epeiric sea from the Acadian Orogen. You can see that the exposure is pretty great on these Corridor H roadcuts, but that we had a moderate amount of snow and ice to cope with that day…

IMG_1794

We saw some interesting “jellyroll” looking structures there… potential features indicating the “rolling up” of sedimentary layers as they destabilized, slumped and tumbled downslope.

IMG_1783

Unfortunately, these “jellyrolls” were only delineated by the alternation between oxidized (red) and reduced (gray-green) layering. I would have preferred some more robust criterion, such as grain size differences. Redox reaction fronts can be an indication of primary sedimentary layering, but they can also be diagenetic, or controlled by structures like joints. Just the same, these ones are pretty cool, even if I’m not 100% positive that they represent soft-sediment deformation.

IMG_1783b

There was a thick sandstone unit there, too. Can you spot the cross-bedding in this exposure?

IMG_1785

Here’s some more cross-bedding. Note the truncated tops to the cross-beds (indicating these beds are oriented with “up” being stratigraphic “up”; that is to say: they have not been tectonically inverted). Also, note the gray mud rip-up clasts right at the boundary between one massive sandstone bed and the next one overlying it:

IMG_1786

Here’s a slightly more complicated scene: What do you see?

IMG_1790

Surely you noted the coarsening of the grain size. Part of this outcrop is conglomerate: a sedimentary rock made of pebbles. Here’s what I see:

IMG_1790anno

And here’s another conglomeratic bed, full of small carbonate rip-up clasts. Where did the carbonate come from? This is surprising to me: the Hampshire Formation is supposed to be terrestrial. Are these limestone clasts derived from the Acadian Highlands themselves? Or is this contemporaneous carbonate from an adjacent depositional environment?

IMG_1792

You noted the white weathering rind on the big one at the bottom of that last picture, right?

Here’s a look at another outcrop, further down the road. More red beds. Note the rhythmic alternation between siltstone and shale:

IMG_1800

Note how they both get thinner as you work your way up in the sequence.

There are reduced layers in here, too.

IMG_1802

Note the coarse grain size in the middle of this gray-green reduced stratum:

IMG_1801

If you trace this layer out to the right, you will find that it abruptly truncates, in contact with the fine-grained red beds:

IMG_1803

My interpretation:

IMG_1803anno

Note the cross-cutting relationship here: the gray-green conglomerate must be younger than the red siltstone and shale, since it cuts across them.

A last look at this outcrop as we prepare to leave:

IMG_1805

Note the low-angle cross-beds in the lower red bed unit (bounded above and below by thin greenish reduced layers).

Our third stop on the Allegheny Front was this roadcut… Click through for a full sized panorama of the outcrop.

IMG_1819

This caught our eye because that’s not a whitish sandstone layer sandwiched between red beds. Instead, it’s a black siltstone / shale unit.

IMG_1819anno

The black layer, about 5 m thick, was a limestone / limy siltstone / shale, with alternating beds 2-5 cm thick. It gets more massive toward the top:

IMG_1816

In it, we found marine fossils, like these articulate brachiopods…

IMG_1806

IMG_1808

… and these gastropods (snails):

IMG_1809

IMG_1812

IMG_1814

IMG_1815

Wow – this surprised us. Neither of us thought the Hampshire Formation had any marine strata within it. Was this black, limy, fossiliferous layer representative of a small transgression (sea level rise) over our deltaic floodplains (red beds)? Here’s a closer look at the base of the black unit:

IMG_1818

IMG_1818anno

It seems to have come on pretty suddenly. That gray zone could reflect primary coloration, or its coloring could be a secondary diagenetic reaction between the oxidized zone below and the carbon-rich limestone above.

So, in summary: We interpret the black layer as resulting from low-oxygen marine deposition. But that doesn’t sound like the Hampshire Formation. Two possibilities occur to me: Does this suddenly black limy interval indicate that this isn’t the Hampshire Formation? Or did we just ‘discover’ a new marine portion of a previously-thought-to-be-terrestrial-only geologic unit?

Any thoughts?